The Pennsylvania tri-co (Swarthmore-Haverford-Bryn Mawr) have a very active LGBT community, specially considering their size.
Being a transsexual, a primary reason Swarthmore clicked beside me had been the accessibility to gender-neutral housing and its numerous queer groups.
“could you instead be at a college with 1,000 individuals where 10% of students are homosexual or at a college with 25,000 where 5% of this pupils are homosexual? Given that people that are gay to cluster together, perhaps you are best off during the larger college.”
It was definitely my logic once I placed on schools, but after being truly a student for four years at one particular 30K pupils college (which made com that is autostraddle list on most lesbian-friendly universities, as well), I’m able to unequivocally state that your particular logic is much more flawed compared to the OP’s, unfortuitously. Gay individuals try not to “group together” by itself. while you will have a specific subset this is certainly greatly active in the Pride Alliance, other activist student groups, etc., there is an abundance of homosexual those who aren’t into main-stream activities/grouping that is gay. At an university that is large you will be positively completely not likely to satisfy those 1,250 gays and lesbians. when you look at the in an identical way much associated with right populace is lost for you at a sizable state uni, a lot of the homosexual populace is “absorbed” to the public aswell.